Maybe/Ruskin and Council voting footprint across covered winning cards.

Updated Jul 10, 2026, 2:21 PM

Cohort Impact

Breadth vs Leverage

5.8xCouncil at-win TDH vs Maybe/Ruskin96 / 102Council-touched covered winners4Maybe + Ruskin both-voted winners40 vs 820%+ share cases

This view uses fully covered winners only. It compares cohort breadth, at-win TDH, and share of each winner's total TDH.

Cards touched
16
96
Threshold hits
4
65
At-win TDH
186.7M
1.1B
20%+ leverage
8
40
Share of covered TDH
3%
17%
Maybe + RuskinCouncil
VoterCardsAt-Win TDH
David64246.4M
Blocknoob62243.9M
Giopetto49210.7M
ruskin10176.9M
Arsonic35138.7M
HugoFaz71118.8M
OnlyMemes2267.5M
RegularDad8052.8M
maybe109.8M

Interpretation

Council shows the broader aggregate voting footprint across covered winners: it touched 96 of 102 winners and supplied 16.7% of covered at-win TDH, compared with 2.9% for Maybe/Ruskin.

Maybe/Ruskin support is more concentrated. Both handles appear together on 4 winners, while Council clears the 4+ voter threshold on 65 winners and has 40 cases above 20% of a winner's TDH versus 8 for Maybe/Ruskin. This is evidence of voting footprint, not proof of what would have happened without either cohort.