6529
Cohort Impact
Breadth vs Leverage
Maybe/Ruskin and Council voting footprint across covered winning cards.
Updated Jul 10, 2026, 2:21 PMCohort Impact
Breadth vs Leverage
5.8xCouncil at-win TDH vs Maybe/Ruskin96 / 102Council-touched covered winners4Maybe + Ruskin both-voted winners40 vs 820%+ share cases
This view uses fully covered winners only. It compares cohort breadth, at-win TDH, and share of each winner's total TDH.
Cards touched
16
96
Threshold hits
4
65
At-win TDH
186.7M
1.1B
20%+ leverage
8
40
Share of covered TDH
3%
17%
Maybe + RuskinCouncil
VoterCardsAt-Win TDH
David64246.4M
Blocknoob62243.9M
Giopetto49210.7M
ruskin10176.9M
Arsonic35138.7M
HugoFaz71118.8M
OnlyMemes2267.5M
RegularDad8052.8M
maybe109.8M
Interpretation
Council shows the broader aggregate voting footprint across covered winners: it touched 96 of 102 winners and supplied 16.7% of covered at-win TDH, compared with 2.9% for Maybe/Ruskin.
Maybe/Ruskin support is more concentrated. Both handles appear together on 4 winners, while Council clears the 4+ voter threshold on 65 winners and has 40 cases above 20% of a winner's TDH versus 8 for Maybe/Ruskin. This is evidence of voting footprint, not proof of what would have happened without either cohort.
WinnerMaybe/RuskinM+R ShareCouncilCouncil Share
#492 Pursuit of Volatility20K0%38M62%#481 The Sacrifice of the Memes00%31.4M60%#484 From Network Society with Love00%39M57%#418 No TAP, No Treat00%17.7M52%#489 Believe in Summer00%26.4M49%#425 Seize what is yours00%22.3M49%#473 The Network00%30M43%#440 FREEDOM TO CONNECT00%11.3M38%#472 SEIZE PEACE00%24.4M38%#468 The Nodes of Production18.2M38%1.4M3%