Maybe/Ruskin and Council voting footprint across covered winning cards.

Updated Aug 24, 2026, 4:49 PM

Cohort Impact

Breadth vs Leverage

5.7xCouncil at-win TDH vs Maybe/Ruskin98 / 120Council-touched covered winners4Maybe + Ruskin both-voted winners40 vs 920%+ share cases

This view uses fully covered winners only. It compares cohort breadth, at-win TDH, and share of each winner's total TDH.

Cards touched
17
98
Threshold hits
4
68
At-win TDH
211.6M
1.2B
20%+ leverage
9
40
Share of covered TDH
3%
16%
Maybe + RuskinCouncil
VoterCardsAt-Win TDH
Blocknoob64275.7M
David63263.1M
Giopetto56245.5M
ruskin11201.8M
HugoFaz78145.1M
Arsonic33127.7M
RegularDad8374.4M
OnlyMemes2267.5M
maybe109.8M

Interpretation

Council shows the broader aggregate voting footprint across covered winners: it touched 98 of 120 winners and supplied 15.7% of covered at-win TDH, compared with 2.8% for Maybe/Ruskin.

Maybe/Ruskin support is more concentrated. Both handles appear together on 4 winners, while Council clears the 4+ voter threshold on 68 winners and has 40 cases above 20% of a winner's TDH versus 9 for Maybe/Ruskin. This is evidence of voting footprint, not proof of what would have happened without either cohort.