Voting groups found organically by repeated at-win co-voting consistency.
Updated Aug 24, 2026, 4:49 PMOrganic Cohorts
Consistent Co-Voting Groups
7candidate groups8strongest group size14,387signal pairs439eligible voters
This analysis uses no preloaded cohort list. It links voters who repeatedly had positive at-win votes on the same fully covered winners, then grows clusters from the strongest recurring pairs.
GulYildizSunRunnergpebblesNLVmonomesaLavaaGangGhostPeppercrimsonovoidchk
91shared winners20all-member wins88%consistency10.5%covered TDH
RegularDadLavaaGangcrimsonovoidchkYEKTAcadmonkeyShaggy8627MaxMyEthbluechipgrails
81shared winners12all-member wins83%consistency2.6%covered TDH
AEZYKillstrike6metaversefercaggianoJamesAndrewTarainAbstractZokuOnlyMemes
53shared winners7all-member wins69%consistency0.9%covered TDH
JasonOPhotoZigmarillionAEZYKillstrikeBrynnAliseJamesAndrewTarainAbstractOnlyMemes
60shared winners10all-member wins68%consistency1%covered TDH
GulYildizSunRunnergpebblesNLVJasonOPhotoMagniintrepidMagniII
90shared winners5all-member wins91%consistency7.5%covered TDH
1dontknowsMoonZoeyMABSoliiiartsenemsadHoizonvertigo21_
15shared winners3all-member wins84%consistency0%covered TDH
1dontknowsMoonZoeyBicassoMABsenemsadMadaCollectsdesolalasisivertigo
15shared winners1all-member wins83%consistency0.4%covered TDH
Strongest Pairs3+ wins / 1.2x lift
6metaverseKillstrike
3081% / 2.6x Shaggy8627YEKTA
3881% / 2x crimsonovoidchkShaggy8627
4289% / 1.8x gpebblesGulYildiz
7796% / 1.3x GulYildizSunRunner
7895% / 1.3x GulYildizmonomesa
7097% / 1.3x diegorstthememesmm
3191% / 2.1x cadmonkeyMaxMyEth
3280% / 2x LavaaGangSunRunner
6592% / 1.3x GulYildizLavaaGang
6896% / 1.3x davidGulYildiz
6298% / 1.3x gpebblesSunRunner
7189% / 1.3x bluechipgrailsShaggy8627
2787% / 2.2x GulYildizHugoFaz
7394% / 1.3x JamesAndrewTarainAbstract
2175% / 3x bluechipgrailsMaxMyEth
2581% / 2.4x Interpretation
The strongest signal is repeated co-presence at the moment a submission won, not merely one shared vote. High overlap means one voter's winning-card votes often coincide with another's; high lift means the pair appears together more often than their individual voting frequency would predict.
Treat these as candidate blocs, not accusations. The chart finds consistency in public voting behavior, but it cannot prove coordination, private communication, or whether those votes changed the final outcome.