Voting groups found organically by repeated at-win co-voting consistency.

Updated Jul 10, 2026, 2:22 PM

Organic Cohorts

Consistent Co-Voting Groups

8candidate groups8strongest group size10,136signal pairs425eligible voters

This analysis uses no preloaded cohort list. It links voters who repeatedly had positive at-win votes on the same fully covered winners, then grows clusters from the strongest recurring pairs.

Group 12,091.8
crimsonovoidchkcadmonkeyShaggy8627YEKTAMaxMyEthbluechipgrailsAldoverxAnimatedNFT
59shared winners8all-member wins80%consistency2.6%covered TDH
Group 21,933.6
AEZYKillstrike6metaverseTarainAbstractfercaggianoZokuOnlyMemesErmanGulbag
49shared winners6all-member wins76%consistency1.1%covered TDH
Group 31,624.6
JasonOPhotoKillstrike6metaverseBrynnAliseTarainAbstractJamesAndrewOnlyMemespelingenc
53shared winners5all-member wins71%consistency1.1%covered TDH
Group 41,555.5
AEZYKillstrike6metaversealexisolinartTarainAbstractJamesAndrewfercaggianoarchitsharma
55shared winners5all-member wins67%consistency0%covered TDH
Group 51,488.9
HugoFazcrimsonovoidchkHet_PateljyppyAnaNovoMaxMyEthxAnimatedNFTpobedeen
75shared winners6all-member wins78%consistency6.6%covered TDH
Group 61,374.9
AEZYfercaggianoricardotakamurasimoErmanGulbaguyoMaryamhasaniartShaggy
36shared winners2all-member wins74%consistency0%covered TDH
Group 71,350.4
AEZYKillstrikefercaggianoricardotakamuradougfriesenBadArtInternErmanGulbagOMPub
45shared winners3all-member wins73%consistency0%covered TDH
Group 81,292.5
NLVcrimsonovoidchkShaggy8627YEKTAalexisolinartraredaemonErmanAnimated_6529
73shared winners3all-member wins80%consistency0.5%covered TDH
Strongest Pairs3+ wins / 1.2x lift
6metaverseKillstrike
3387% / 2.2x
Shaggy8627YEKTA
3883% / 1.8x
AEZYfercaggiano
2693% / 2.2x
crimsonovoidchkShaggy8627
4289% / 1.5x
MagniMagniII
13100% / 3.9x
freecodLors
1794% / 2.9x
bluechipgrailsMaxMyEth
2581% / 2.2x
bluechipgrailsYEKTA
2787% / 1.9x
cadmonkeyMaxMyEth
3182% / 1.8x
bluechipgrailsShaggy8627
2787% / 1.9x
BrynnAliseTarainAbstract
2170% / 2.4x
JamesAndrewTarainAbstract
2170% / 2.4x
diegorstthememesmm
2888% / 1.8x
Ermanraredaemon
1474% / 3.4x
MaxMyEthShaggy8627
3079% / 1.7x
6metaverseOnlyMemes
1986% / 2.3x
MaxMyEthxAnimatedNFT
1986% / 2.3x
crimsonovoidchkNLV
5288% / 1.3x

Interpretation

The strongest signal is repeated co-presence at the moment a submission won, not merely one shared vote. High overlap means one voter's winning-card votes often coincide with another's; high lift means the pair appears together more often than their individual voting frequency would predict.

Treat these as candidate blocs, not accusations. The chart finds consistency in public voting behavior, but it cannot prove coordination, private communication, or whether those votes changed the final outcome.